PETA :(

Reason magazine coined the great term “reductio creep” to describe the process in which counterarguments’ conclusions, previously considered absurd, are now enthusiastically embraced by the people you are trying to argue against. The standard example is lawsuits against fast food companies for making people fat – once considered a reductio ad absurdum of efforts by smokers to rid themselves of personal responsibility, these lawsuits have now actually taken place.

There’s a related phenomenon, in which groups do or say things so utterly self-ridiculing and inarguably stupid that any attempt to parody them is rendered pointless. Pilger reached this nadir with his appearance on Lateline a few days ago… and now PETA, well….

Enough rambling from me. I think you’ll find this speaks for itself.

Advertisements
Explore posts in the same categories: Weird

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: