Cricket Isn’t The 100m Sprint
I couldn’t agree more with this article panning the Anti-Doping commission intruding in cricket.
Explore posts in the same categories: SportSo much for the disease. What about the cure? WADA developed stringent and zealous procedures in the context of athletics, and rightly so. But one size does not fit all. To apply rules designed for athletics and apply them to cricket is disproportionate and potentially destructive.
A Yobbo\'s View 
August 26, 2009 at 9:06 pm
Yeah, agreed. Still unconvinced how any drug can make you bowl a better outswinger, or make you stop nicking to first slip.
August 30, 2009 at 10:16 pm
Agreed. Warney’s sentence was a joke. The only possible use of steroid in cricket is for fast bowlers, and even than, it is dubious.
September 3, 2009 at 11:37 am
Well, not really.
Steroid use can be very helpful in recovering from injuries faster.
But I don’t see any reason why that shouldn’t be allowed. Surely having the best players fit and playing is better for the game then having them sitting on the sidelines.
October 26, 2009 at 1:18 pm
I reckon I know someone wot is on the gear. Surname might start with “W”. Rhymes with “corner”.
Like Jerry Seinfeld says: NTTAWWT. Just thought I’d mention it.
.
.
.
Erm… that will be all, carry on.
October 27, 2009 at 9:16 am
Regardless of whether you think there’s anything wrong with it or not, saying such a thing about a professional sportsman is defamation and could get you sued BR, even on the internet.
November 5, 2009 at 10:00 am
My mum got sued on the internet.
November 11, 2009 at 11:36 am
I gotta say, I like your studious-looking head, Yobbo.
You look smart and introspective. And discerning.
June 22, 2010 at 10:31 am
Didn’t know you could detect a ‘phone call from an Indian bookie from a urine test?? (but I guess medical science has moved on since my day).
June 22, 2010 at 10:11 pm
I like poo.